Publications from research stream II: Process Modelling Grammars in Practice

Journal papers published

  • Recker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., Green, P.  The Ontological Deficiencies of Process Modeling in Practice. European Journal of Information Systems, In Press.
  • Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P., Indulska, M. Do Ontological Deficiencies in Modeling Grammars Matter? MIS Quarterly 2010, In Press.
  • Recker, J. “Opportunities and Constraints: The Current Struggle with BPMN,” Business Process Management Journal (16:1) 2010, pp 181-201.
  • Green, P., and Rosemann, M. “Ontological Analysis of Integrated Process Models: Testing Hypotheses,” Australasian Journal of Information Systems (9:1) 2001, pp 30-38.

Journal papers in development

  • Recker, J. (initial submission November 2009): Ontological Clarity and Process Model Interpretability: Examining the Role of Gateway Constructs. Under 2nd round review at: Journal of Database Management.
  • Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Recker, J. (initial submission March 2009): Complementary Use of Modeling Techniques: Insights from Representation Theory and Practice. Under 2nd round review at: Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems.
  • Indulska, M., Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P. (planned submission March 2010): Issues, Benefits and Challenges of Process Modeling: Results from a Global Delphi Study. To be submitted to: Information Systems Journal.

Conference papers published

  • Indulska, M., Green, P., Recker, J., and Rosemann, M. “Business Process Modeling: Perceived Benefits,” in: Conceptual Modeling – ER 2009, S. Castano, U. Dayal and A.H.F. Laender (eds.), Springer, Gramado, Brazil, 2009, pp. 458-471.
  • Indulska, M., Recker, J., Rosemann, M., and Green, P. “Process Modeling: Current Issues and Future Challenges,” in: Advanced Information Systems Engineering – CAiSE 2009, P. van Eck, J. Gordijn and R. Wieringa (eds.), Springer, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009, pp. 501-514.
  • Recker, J., Indulska, M., and Green, P. “Extending Representational Analysis: BPMN User and Developer Perspectives,” in: Business Process Management – BPM 2007, G. Alonso, P. Dadam and M. Rosemann (eds.), Springer, Brisbane, Australia, 2007, pp. 384-399.
  • Recker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., and Green, P. “How Good is BPMN Really? Insights from Theory and Practice,” 14th European Conference on Information Systems, Association for Information Systems, Goeteborg, Sweden, 2006, pp. 1582-1593.
  • Recker, J., Indulska, M., Rosemann, M., and Green, P. “Do Process Modelling Techniques Get Better? A Comparative Ontological Analysis of BPMN,” 16th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Australasian Chapter of the Association for Information Systems, Sydney, Australia, 2005.
  • Green, P., and Rosemann, M. “Perceived Ontological Weaknesses of Process Modelling Techniques: Further Evidence,” 10th European Conference on Information Systems, Association for Information Systems, Gdansk, Poland, 2002, pp. 312-321.
  • Green, P., and Rosemann, M. “Ontological Analysis of Integrated Process Modeling: Some Initial Insights,” 11th Australian Conference on Information Systems, Brisbane, Australia, 2000.

Doctoral Theses

  • Recker, J. “Understanding Process Modelling Grammar Continuance: A Study of the Consequences of Representational Capabilities,” Unpublished PhD Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 2008.
  • Green, P. “An Ontological Analysis of ISAD Grammars in Upper CASE Tools,” Unpublished PhD Thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 1996.